ASP.NET is an open source framework for web server-side application. In 2015, a new type of ASP.NET web form that was released on the 9th of February 2015. It is a model-view-controller (MVC) implementation pattern. Apart from the proprietary component for web forms, it is also a software that is open-sourced. There are a number of pros and cons of asp.net mvc. These pros and cons are discussed below.
Pros of ASP.NET MVC
In the normal web forms based on ASP.NT, you have to pay a price for your looking similar to the form of a window. Despite its reliability of keeping every stated data in the form, it is affected by web limitations. It requires a hidden form field inside of which the data needs to be stored in form of a giant string. Your page will therefore get some significant number of bytes. You page will subsequently load slower, consume more bandwidth and data of the user. With the ViewState however, you have some sort of control. With the ASP.NET MVC, ViewState is no more available as well as generated HTML. You can therefore control the HTML on the page strictly. You therefore have more control with comes with more responsibility. With this, you will be able to output elegant XHTML, without expected results that could be added. You will require good knowledge of HTML for this.
Server-side that is faster:
It is a known fact that faster loading time for website could provide a significant boost to smaller sites and popular ones as well, even if the speed is just marginal or twice as fast. With MVC however, you have a potential of getting a website that loads up to 8000 times faster. This is because lower processing is required as a template is simply processed as opposed to the creation of a control tree that is complicated.
Simplified multiple related views model:
It is possible to create several of a page’s version that shows data that are the same, in a format that is slightly difference. For instance my website for tracking RSS package.It is possible for the tracking information to be viewed from an RSS reader, a mobile browser, or a desktop browser that is full featured. For all the cases, the same data will be shown, but the actual output that is rendered will be different. If, for instance, I decide that I want to make a version that is specific for only iPhone, all I have to do is create another view and then apply a controller action that already exists.
Cons of ASP.NET MVC
With ASP.NET web forms, one of the biggest problems was carrying out tests. It was difficult to test the exact output. The code at the back seems to be at a location that has codes that are important, which will never be unit tested. For both web forms and MVC, it is better that the logic is kept away from the page. This is, however, not ideal or easy. With MVC, you can easily carry out a logic unit test, particular to a page. For you to do this, you just test your controller’s action. They are easy to test, regular classes.
It is hard to change a site that is only existing
MVC is also a style apart from been a framework. You can opt to change only particular pages that are required, but this comes at a high cost. The issue is the fact that MVC is different in a radical way. The advantages of changing are minimal when compared to having to change all your former pages. If you are changing your web site to MVC, you can encounter problems of attempting to maintain the addresses of existing pages. Particularly, you cannot have a slash training a route. If you intend to keep the URLs that exist and contain trailing slashes, this type of URL cannot be routinely generated for you with the built-in feature. With this, you will not get one of the huge benefits of migrating to MVC.
Not suitable for out of the box SEO
Even though it is possible to work around SEO issues, as opposed to the trailing slash problem that does not have an alternative that is reasonable, it could be challenging and time-consuming achieving it. The engine for routing prefers for several URLs to render a particular page, as opposed to ensuring a particular address for every page. An engine for rewiring URL can be applied towards getting the results that you require. This will help you to achieve your search engine optimization goals, so that you do not lose traffic and business that you will have gained from ranking high on search engines.
There might be problems if you are not on IIS7
Several important adjustments have been made in the IIS latest versions. This makes them far better and effective, compared to the former versions. .Net integration is taking to a whole new level in IIS7. If you are not on the IIS7, there are some problems you will face. If you host your homepage on the domain’s root, you might get a 404 error. Due to the dynamic nature of MVC pages, IIS6 HTTP compression does not work. Static files could perform badly. This is because for the processing of the MVC pages, it is vital that every page requests are handled by .NET.
The article discusses the pros and cons of ASP.NET MVC. The ASP.NET MVC is the latest version of ASP.NET web forms. You are expected to have little to no problems if you are just building your website from the start as you can just use the IIS7 directly. You will get a web site that loads reasonably faster amongst other benefits. If you have a website on the .NET MVC, built on previous versions, it is advisable that you upgrade them to IISS7. It is also very hectic to convert an existing web site to ASP.NET MVC.